Absentee ballot return rates

by: Grebner

Thu Oct 23, 2008 at 19:03:33 PM EDT

(bump! – promoted by Eric B.)

Just about 925,000 ballots have been requested from local Clerks, and about 45% of those have been voted and returned as of noon, Oct. 23.  They’re coming back at a rate of about 4% per day, which makes sense given there are 12 days before the election.

About 15,000 requests are being received each day, so we’ll probably top out at just over 1 million ballots, or about 19% of all votes cast statewide.  (I’m expecting 5.2 million votes.) 

As I previously mentioned, Democrats seem to be holding their own or possibly slightly out-performing the other side.

Thes conclusions are based on data stored in a program maintained by the Secretary of State which helps local Clerks keep track of the ballots requested and returned.  The data is not complete, because many Clerks of small units of government don’t participate, while other Clerks use only part of the system.  I’ve made crude interpolations to fill in the gaps in the data.

I’ll try to post additional data each day through November 4.

UPDATE 10-24-2008: 49.9% of the ballots have now been returned to local Clerks.

UPDATE: 10-27-2008: 53.2% have been returned. 

UPDATE: 10-28-2008: 57.1% have been returned.

UPDATE: 10-29-2008: 62.9% have been returned.  It looks as if the precentage of returned ballots is about one percentage point higher among Democrats than Republicans, with independents lagging about 3 points further back.

UPDATE: 10-30-2008: 67.0% returned, of 1.02 million mailed out.  It doesn’t look to me as if this curve will get very close to 100% by Tuesday.  Normally, ballot return rate tends to taper off the final few days, but it will have to increase this year.  Hmmmm? 

UPDATE: 10-31-2008 – 71.1% returned.  I really don’t get it – why isn’t the curve ramping up?  Only three remaining days to return ballots, and we’re still almost 20% below the typical final return precentage of 90%.  The problem doesn’t appear to be that a few Clerks haven’t processed all the ballots yet;  the return rates are heavily clustered around 70%, with very few above 80%. 

UPDATE: 11-3-2008 – 78.7% returned.  Still not very good.  It appears that lots of people APPLIED for absentee ballots who had never voted that way before, and they’re not doing a very good job of RETURNING them.  That is, the return rate is very high among repeaters, but not among first-time applicants.

Based on PPC’s coding of partisan orientation, and looking only at municipalities where the data appears to be complete:

Democratic voters requesting ballots:  258,000.  Returned to Clerk: 47.2%

Republican voters requesting ballots: 223,000.  Returned to Clerk: 44.9%

Middle-of-the-road voters requesting ballots: 315,000.  Returned to Clerk: 43.3% 

UPDATE: 10/31/2008:  The following chart looks at voters who have requested a ballot from one of the local Clerks who maintain their absentee list using the Secretary of State’s system – about 90% of the statewide total.

DEM% refers to my firm’s coding of their partisan leaning.  From our polling this year, a rule of thumb has emerged many voters have shifted about 10% more Democratic than these estimates. What’s interesting to note is that the Republicans seem to have a tiny lead in getting their people to actually return their ballots, and that people at the very center of the political spectrum are holding back, possibly because there’s no one to nag them, or possibly because the voting takes longer for them because they don’t have a straight-ticket instinct to fall back on.

DEM%      COUNT      %  RETURNED
0 131118 75.5
10 75887 70.5
20 55617 70.4
30 39576 68.7
40 46269 67.1
50 49783 64.3
60 48045 67.5
70 47280 69.7
80 51761 72.0
90 68124 70.8
100 226000 73.8

Comments

10 responses to “Absentee ballot return rates”

  1. Ours are back, that’s two for Barack!
    Unless attacked, I think replaced Presidents need to go to their rooms the day after the election and stay there. They should lose all of their power, unless Congress votes a national emergency.
    No words can describe the disgust and anger I feel towards all Republicans, elected and supporters. They are either directly responsible for the problems or enabled them with their votes. I wish “they” could be made to pay first or only for all they’ve done, i.e., go to Iraq; pay for the bailout; lose their jobs; lose their health care; eat tainted food; lose their houses, pay 35% interest rates on their debt, well you get the point.

    I’m so pissed, I have eliminated Republicans from my small circle of family and friends. There is nothing, absolutely nothing that I have in common or want to share with any of them. May socialism envelop this country like the greed that destroyed it.

    by: dkmich @ Sat Nov 01, 2008 at 06:29:46 AM CDT

    1. My mother-in-law just finished filling her’s out
      yesterday and I will drop it off for her today. Don’t know why it took her so long to fill it out. She just couldn’t seem to get motivated to do it. And damn it, didn’t ask me for any advice on who or what to vote for. 😉

      The end of the human race will be that it will eventually die of civilization.

      – Ralph Waldo Emerson
      by: michmark @ Sat Nov 01, 2008 at 07:21:57 AM CDT

  2. Why aren’t we seeing a Democratic tilt?
    All states with “early voting” seem to show Democrats taking advantage in much bigger numbers than Republicans. I would have thought we’d see at least a little bit of the same phenomenon here – but there isn’t even a trace of it.
    by: Grebner @ Sat Nov 01, 2008 at 11:41:09 AM CDT

    1. Could it be
      that our absentee voter drive is just not done very well?

      The end of the human race will be that it will eventually die of civilization.

      – Ralph Waldo Emerson
      by: michmark @ Sat Nov 01, 2008 at 17:46:49 PM CDT

  3. Frankly, I think that goes without saying.
    It’s nice the Republican effort seems to be almost equally confused.
    One would think our side would have assembled a list of 400,000 people to worry about, with names checked off as ballots are returned, and the delinquents doled out to 20,000 local volunteers who are tasked to track down Ms. Jenkins and Mr. O’Keefe one at a time, armed with the knowledge that regardless of what they say, no ballot has arrived at Clawson City Hall yet? But making robo-calls to a wide universe, and sending bulk rate mail to an even wider one, is so much easier. Treat everybody the same, regardless of whether they EVER vote absentee, or are over sixty, or have requested a ballot, or have already returned it – that’s so much simpler to manage.

    Back to my main point: the overall pace seems too slow to me. I’ve never seen an election where many ballots came back on election day – there’s usually just a trickle. So Monday needs to bring nearly 20% of the total number issued, or we’re going to see a return rate below 90%.

    Maybe a bunch of people applied who have decided they didn’t really mean to, and will instead show up at the precinct to vote in person? Is it possible there’s a secret ballot-tank in the Secretary of State computer system that’s temporarily holding 100,000 ballots, randomly selected from five hundred townships and cities across the state? Whatever happens, I’m going to learn something, because I certainly don’t understand what’s going on.

    by: Grebner @ Sat Nov 01, 2008 at 23:26:28 PM CDT

    1. Untestable hypothesis
      Maybe Democrats are returning their ballots at a higher rate because they’re sharing the same enthusiasm as appears in every early-voting state. But that advantage is matched by a technically superior Republican absentee program, leading to what appears to be a simple tie.
      I can’t think of any way to test that theory, except to wait for a year where we don’t have the edge in enthusiasm, and see if the other side clobbers us.

      It seems plausible.

      by: Grebner @ Sun Nov 02, 2008 at 02:43:33 AM CST

  4. Absentee ballot return rate among people who voted absentee in the Jan. 15 presidential primary.
    If we restrict our analysis to people who applied for absentee ballots back in January, a slightly different pattern emerges – Democrats are sending their ballots back to be counted at a noticeably higher rate than Republicans. But the independents still bring up the rear.
    1/15 applications percent
    Primary received returned
    ballot by 10/31

    Dems 149190 84.3%
    No-party 961 78.9
    Repubs 134571 80.6

    by: Grebner @ Mon Nov 03, 2008 at 00:02:35 AM CST

  5. clerks oversight?
    I’ve checked my parents’ and my own indicators in the VAN, presumably dumped each day from the SoS QVF. My father’s is listed as returned, my mother’s is not, mine is not. Perhaps the city clerks are not getting the data entered into the QVF?
    Is this a historically overwhelming number of absentee ballots?

    by: William Allen Simpson @ Mon Nov 03, 2008 at 08:33:19 AM CST

    1. The Secretary of State lists you all correctly.
      It shows your ballot was returned Nov. 1, your mom’s on Oct. 31, and your dad’s on Oct 21.
      I’ve looked for evidence that backlog at certain Clerks’ offices are causing the problem, and aside from a handful of exceptions, that’s not it.

      I’ll post some additional data that illuminates what appears to be the cause: people applying who aren’t “regular absentee voters”. Could there be a problem with people not knowing the correct postage and getting hung-up on that point?

      This bears looking into.

      by: Grebner @ Mon Nov 03, 2008 at 18:25:30 PM CST

      1. Looks like a backlog to me!
        I’d say this would be prime evidence of a backlog.
        I saw my father return his in person within a few days after we received them by mail. They arrived on a Friday, he returned his immediately on Monday. So, looks like it took over a week for the city clerk to enter into the QVF.

        Also, I’m told my father returned my mother’s in person on a Wednesday the following week (although I wasn’t there to see that happen). It looks like a delay of about 9 days to Friday (Oct. 31st).

        Finally, I returned mine in person, but it only looks like 5 days to be listed on the following Saturday (Nov. 1st).

        That doesn’t explain the failure to show up in the VAN by the Monday (Nov. 3rd), unless silly Michigan VAN maintainers weren’t handling the updates on a daily basis!

        by: William Allen Simpson @ Fri Nov 21, 2008 at 08:28:37 AM CST

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *