2012 – the fourth consecutive wave election?

by: Grebner

Sun Sep 23, 2012 at 22:34:56 PM EDT

I hate to agree with anything that appears in the Detroit News; it always makes me wonder whether I’m being suckered.  But it may be true that Michigan voters are shifting toward the Democratic alternatives in each of the 110 races for state representative on the ballot this fall.

At PPC, our polling is almost always centered on the candidates whose names appear on a specific ballot, so we haven’t tried to test the general statewide political climate.  But in the half dozen races we’ve polled recently, there’s been a consistent thread in the results:  the Democratic candidates were doing better than we expected.

Speaking impressionistically (because the polls were mostly commissioned by campaigns which haven’t publicly released the results) the shifts in allegiances we’ve seen haven’t been solely among independents and ticket-splitters.  For some reason, Democratic candidates are picking up substantial numbers of votes from people we expect to be consistent Republican supporters.  The Republican candidates are struggling to hold onto their bases, getting clobbered among ticket-splitters, and not making any noticeable headway among Democrats.  In short, the polling looks a lot like the numbers we saw in 2008.

Three months ago, my sense was that Democratic candidates running for the eight bottom-of-ticket statewide education offices would take an average of 51% or 52% of the two-party vote, which is what I mean by “baseline”.  But I’m beginning to think the actual number will be 54% or 55%.  (In 2008, it soared to 57%, which I never expected to see in my lifetime.)

If the baseline is as high as 54%, both Democrats and Republicans ought to re-prioritize where they are spending their resources.  Shaky Democratic incumbents will turn out to be safe, and not worth much attention.  “Toss-up” seats will turn out NOT to be toss-ups, but fairly easy Dem wins, at least if the Democrats run competent campaigns.  The real battlegrounds will be seats that are classed “leaning Republican”,  where a mistake or a little extra effort may make all the difference.  And a few apparently safe Republicans may wake up on November 7 and discover their careers have taken an unexpected turn.

I’m not 100% sure the baseline will rise as high as 54%, but I’ve seen half a dozen surprising polls, and not one of them has been something that should make the Republicans smile. 

These comments are focused on the races for state representative, because I wonder if the phenomenon may be focused on state offices, as the result of hostility toward Republican legislation, especially the taxation of pensions.  But the impact is likely to be broader, and to trickle down to county and township offices as well.


Comments

8 responses to “2012 – the fourth consecutive wave election?”

  1. Trend
    You’re not the only one picking this up. There have been pollsters who seem to be picking up some kind of wave. Maybe not as high a wave as 2010 or 2008, but much closer to 2008 than say the 2004 general election. I’m not a numbers guy, but Romney absolutely can not make any further major stumbles or this will be undeniably a wave election.
    Just a month or two ago Dems were scratchig just to keep the Senate. I’m now hearing that while it’s still not looking like we’ll take the House, that things are trending that way. For something to switch so quickly shows that’s something is building; I just don’t know what. It’s particularly amazing that this is after all of the voter suppression and gerrymandering.

    What I’m worried about is that no one seems to be on television on the Dem side. I’d have thought the Dems would be attacking Bolger day and night to make this a referendum on the state GOP. They say that you let your opponent implode, but it’s far enough out that if they don’t take advantage of this they’ll kick themselves if they just almost take back the Supreme Court and/or House.

    by: MiddleGrandGuy @ Mon Sep 24, 2012 at 03:20:15 AM UTC

    1. The deflation of Romney and Hoekstra in Michigan
      One way to allow your opponents to create a wave is to lose heart in your statewide candidates. Even without the US Senate and the presidential candidate, many Republicans around the state would have reason to go to the polls. But there will be pockets (in Washtenaw, for example) where a moderately serious Republican would look at the choices on the ballot and simply not find any reason to care.
      Two years ago, Virg’s implosion meant we had nothing on the ballot in rural Republican areas like Barry or Livingston. And that helped the Republicans run up the score against us.

      by: Grebner @ Mon Sep 24, 2012 at 04:52:21 AM UTC

  2. Don’t intterupt your opponent when he’s making a mistake.
    The Republicans have had two answers for everything:
    1. Tax cuts for the rich.
    2. Move further to the right.

    Economy is doing well? = Tax cuts for the rich will continue our prosperity.
    Economy is in the tank? = Tax cuts for the rich will get the economy going again.

    Your candidate won? = That’s because voters want him to move further to the right.
    Your candidate lost? = He wouldn’t have if he had moved further to the right.

    Why did they think that was going to work forever?

    by: Buster Vainamoinen @ Mon Sep 24, 2012 at 13:29:18 PM UTC

  3. Thinking from the other side of the hill
    While Romney won’t pull out in the same public manner that McCain did in 2008, it is interesting thinking about a potential wave from the other side of the hill. If you are the GOP, who do you save?
    Romney can’t save Hoekstra, and my guess is that the GOP is going down in the 1st Congressional District. If I was the State GOP, I’d do everything possible to keep the Supreme Court majority; in a wave election, we all know what happens to sleeping judges (or parties).

    My question is whether the GOP can hold the House. My gut says that there are 15 seats that the GOP could lose, and a number are already lost, thanks in part to the clown show that was the Jase and Roy show. However, from a tactical point of view, does it really hurt the GOP that bad if they lose the House this cycle? It helps Snyder run to the middle for 2014, and given that the Senate GOP is going to lose at least five seats in 2014 regardless (one of the downsides of having a 26-12 majority), the next session is going to be one of defense on the part of the GOP. The only thing that Snyder would want to watch out for is his AG for the 2014 election. For certain, Schuette has a lean and hungry look….

    by: pbratt @ Mon Sep 24, 2012 at 15:10:07 PM UTC

    1. You’re absolutely right about the Supreme Court
      Based on past performance, Mark Brewer will make this race a top priority (I see quite a few MDP “These 3 Protect Families” ads often while watching the Tigers). The trick will be getting voters to finish their ballot and vote for the Democratic-nominated candidates.

      A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always count on the support of Paul.
      by: Hy Dudgeon @ Mon Sep 24, 2012 at 17:38:20 PM UTC

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *